MSI k8nNeo2 FX : Quel proc le plus puissant ?

Matériel informatique
1

J’ai 1CM MSI k8n Neo2-FX sock939 hyper transport 800Mhz.Quel processeur le puissant est compatible ?
Merci

2

x2 4400 2.2Ghz :neutre: … ou alors un opteron 185 … mais a plus de 300 roro ( :nexath )

3

Un opteron 175 overclocké!

4

l’opteron est le meilleur choix en o/c c’est une bête (pour ce socket lol) et il est plutôt pas mal enfin actuellement par rapport aux C2D il est complètement largué quand mm je te conseillerais plutôt d’attendre et de changer de plateforme

5

4400 et 185 pas compatibles (pb de FSB). J’ai trouvé la liste sur le site US

Merci de votre aide.

Voici la liste :

CPU FSB Ratio Result
Opteron Daul-Core (90nm, L2 Cache 2 x 1MB)
AMD Opteron 165 (E6 version) 200 9 OK
AMD Opteron 170 (E6 version) 200 10 OK
AMD Opteron 175 (E6 version) 200 11 OK
AMD Opteron 180 (E6 version) 200 12 OK
Opteron Single-Core (90nm, L2 Cache 1MB)
AMD Opteron 144 (E4 version) 200 9 OK
AMD Opteron 146 (E4 version) 200 10 OK
AMD Opteron 148 (E4 version) 200 11 OK
AMD Opteron 150 (E4 version) 200 12 OK
AMD Opteron 154 (E4 version) 200 14 OK
Athlon 64 FX Dual-Core (Toledo, 90nm, L2 Cache 2 x 1MB)
Athlon 64 FX60 (E6 version) 200 13 UNDER TESTING
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core (Toledo, 90nm, L2 Cache 2 x 1MB)
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ (E6 version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+ (E6 version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core (Manchester, 90nm, L2 Cache 2 x 512KB)
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 3800+ (E6 version) 200 10 OK
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4200+ (E6 version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4600+ (E6 version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core (Manchester, 90nm, L2 Cache 2 x 512KB)
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 3800+ (E4 version) 200 10 OK
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4200+ (E4 version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4600+ (E4 version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 FX (San Diego, 90nm, L2 Cache 1MB)
Athlon 64 FX-55 (E4 version) 200 13 OK
Athlon 64 FX-57 (E4 version) 200 14 OK
Athlon 64 FX (ClawHammer, 130nm, L2 Cache 1MB)
Athlon 64 FX53 (CG version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 FX55 (CG version) 200 13 OK
Athlon 64 (Toledo, 90nm, L2 Cache 1MB)
Athlon 64 3700+ (E6 version) 200 11 UNDER TESTING
Athlon 64 4000+ (E6 version) 200 12 UNDER TESTING
Athlon 64 (San Diego, 90nm, L2 Cache 1MB)
Athlon 64 3700+ (E4 version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 4000+ (E4 version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 (Venice, 90nm, L2 Cache 512KB)
Athlon 64 3000+ (E6 version) 200 9 OK
Athlon 64 3200+ (E6 version) 200 10 OK
Athlon 64 3400+ (E6 version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 3500+ (E6 version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 3800+ (E6 version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 (Manchester, 90nm, L2 Cache 512KB)
Athlon 64 3200+ (E4 version) 200 10 UNDER TESTING
Athlon 64 3500+ (E4 version) 200 11 UNDER TESTING
Athlon 64 (Venice, 90nm, L2 Cache 512KB)
Athlon 64 3000+ (E3 version) 200 9 OK
Athlon 64 3200+ (E3 version) 200 10 OK
Athlon 64 3500+ (E3 version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 3800+ (E3 version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 (Winchester, 90nm, L2 Cache 512KB)
Athlon 64 3000+ (D0 version) 200 9 OK
Athlon 64 3200+ (D0 version) 200 10 OK
Athlon 64 3500+ (D0 version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 (Newcastle, 130nm, L2 Cache 512KB)
Athlon 64 3000+ (CG version) 200 9 OK
Athlon 64 3200+ (CG version) 200 10 OK
Athlon 64 3400+ (CG version, Hypertransport) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 3500+ (CG version) 200 11 OK
Athlon 64 3800+ (CG version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 (ClawHammer, 130nm, L2 Cache 1MB)
Athlon 64 4000+ (CG version) 200 12 OK
Athlon 64 (ClawHammer, 130nm, L2 Cache 512KB)
Athlon 64 3500+ (CG version) 200 11 OK
Edité le 24/02/2008 à 14:39