non, on est pas du tout sur la meme longeur d'onde. Pour moi la france est largement en avance par rapport à nos voisins l'europe des 15. On est bien plus gaté que nos amis belges, anglais, irlandais, espagnols et suisses.
en angleterre ca fais belle durette qu'ils sont en retard et comme l'as dis ricoPC, c'est souvent du limité.
Bon si tu es si persuadé que la France est à la ramasse ce qui est completement l'inverse, voici quelques liens qui pourront te persuadé.
L'angleterre
When unlimited doesn't mean unlimited
A few years ago in the early days of broadband in the UK, all broadband packages were sold based on their speed. A 512 Kbps residential user would typically pay around £25-30 per month, and faster 1 Mbps or 2 Mbps connections were charged at business rates of about £70-100 per month. This was partly due to the fact that the wholesale costs from BT for these services were very different. In 2004 BT Wholesale changed its charging scheme to usage and capacity-based charging prompting a change in how broadband was sold to end users by flattening the pricing of the end user broadband connections regardless of speed, and charging more for the 'central pipe' (the connection from BT's network to the ISP which provides Internet access). Each ISP had to choose either a 'Usage Based Charging' or a 'Capacity Based Charging' model. The former has a lower fixed cost but the ISP incurs a charge on the amount of traffic their users pass through the network whilst the latter is a higher fixed charge with no usage charges.
These changes resulted in ISPs offering faster connections at lower costs, but it also meant that some kind of limiting factor had to be imposed to ensure costs did not exceed revenue from each user. A 'pay for what you use' type environment has become more popular, and this market has been growing over the last year. NTL however have tried to induce a reversal of this trend by announcing their 10 Mbps product is 'unlimited'. These unlimited products are supposedly offering users the same service they used to receive before these new usage-based products came in to affect.
It should however be noted that this is not always the case and the word 'unlimited' is usually very subjective and subject to small print. This term is still commonly used since it is a very effective marketing tool. An article on TheRegister (The 'free' fairy story) goes in to some details on how Toucan advertise their broadband services as unlimited, without any formal limits, but may restrict over-use of heavy users. After some probing, the actual point that they impose some rate limiting on 'heavy users' is found to be surprisingly low. This problem isn't just limited to Toucan, but they are an example of what is becoming more common.
Many broadband services that classify themselves as 'unlimited' are bound by restrictions of what is normally known as a 'Fair Usage Policy' which usually means that after a certain amount of data has been downloaded by a user in a month, either a warning will be sent to the user to inform them that their usage is deemed excessively high along with a request to curb their usage, or some form of traffic shaping is imposed such that traffic originating from other users of the service are prioritised to ensure they do not receive a degraded quality of service due to a few heavy users. ISPs often neglect to make it clear that if you are a very heavy user, you may find your Internet connection is about the speed of a dial-up connection. Readers may remember much discussion of PlusNet's traffic shaping and Sustainable/Fair Usage Policy last year, and the stir it caused amongst some of their users.
La source de cet article :
http://www.adslguide.org.uk/
On y apprends plusieurs choses :
- l'article date du "Monday, 15 May 2006, 07:31", et au tout début de l'article, il dise que la connexion classique etait du 512 à 25-30£
- pour proposer des connexions pas cher avec un haut débit, les ISP limitaieent la quantité de donnée max que l'on peux transiter
- les ISP proposant de l'illimité ne proposant pas reellement de l'illimité. A partir d'une certaine quantitée de donnée transistait, il y a un avertissement (cf les 2 derniers paragraphes).
grilles des tarifs annuels :
http://www.adslguide.org.uk/isps/summaryli...?order=tco1024k
exemple de prix d'un ISP anglais :
https://www.bethere.co.uk/
En belgique :
va leur demander s'ils ont super connexion
http://forum.hardware.fr/hardwarefr/Discus...11.htm#t7474994
L'europe :
http://www.echosdunet.net/dossiers/dossier...id_dossier=1197
En suisse :
La différence saute aux yeux. Pour une somme variant entre 43 fr. 90 et 49 francs par mois, les Helvètes possèdent un accès rapide standard à l'internet. En France, neuf télécoms propose un débit jusqu'à 10 fois plus important pour 36 fr. 60. Avec, en prime, la téléphonie fixe gratuite sur le territoire national et 40 chaînes de télévision. Les tarifs de Tele2, active dans les deux pays, sont moitié plus bas outre-Doubs.
.......
article qui date un peu mais toujours d'actualité :
http://www.nouvo.ch/h-45
Tu veux d'autres sources pour t'en persuader que la France est dans le peloton de tete ?
et ca ne va qu'en s'améliorant avec la concurence!
)
